Ineffective Voulging
*eyeroll*
Choose the better illustrator
Edited for the benefit of pedants
Edited for the benefit of pedants
Last edited:
Caldwell is way worse for that, but yeah.Easley's work looks like the cover of every single Adult Fantasy novel ever written
You should make your own poll... with blackjack, and hookers.Can you attach more than one poll to a thread?
Otus has a quaint unique style, while Easley's work looks like the cover of every single Adult Fantasy novel ever written (i.e. generic, albeit talented). I give it to Otus.
That being said, two options to choose from isn't exactly what I'd call diverse choice. What of Larry Elmore, Keith Parkinson, Wayne Reynolds, Jim Rolsof, David Trampier, or Tyler Jacobson? There are a LOT of illustrators in the space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_role-playing_game_artists
You must be very fun at the parties you don't get invited to, Voulging.Elmore, Reynolds, Jacobsen: all shit
Screw you, Snarfquest was awesome! You're probably a Caldwell lover (the Rob Leifeld of the D&D world).Elmore fans dont deserve eyeballs

I prefer Parkinson for his textured oils, but I'll allow that his pen & inks weren't as strong.Trampier. There is no contest.
I can't put into words why Holloway was such a massive turn-off for me. Not cartoon-y enough for comedy, too muddy and dorky for horror. Massive turn-off in the 2nd wave D&D products.Hot take: Holloway does great comic action scenes but rather dull monster portraits.
My sentiments exactly.I can't put into words why Holloway was such a massive turn-off for me. Not cartoon-y enough for comedy, too muddy and dorky for horror. Massive turn-off in the 2nd wave D&D products.
"Comic" does a lot of the heavy lifting here. As actual action scenes I find them lacking (see above).Hot take: Holloway does great comic action scenes but rather dull monster portraits.