DangerousPuhson
Should be playing D&D instead
You again twist my words, and skew the intent of my posts so as to pick fights with the petty semantics of my messages - you take what I write, twist it into something sinister or stupid, then attack your own twisted version of what I'm saying. It's getting old.Regardless, cut to the chase of it. Are you saying you're offended by statements not endlessly and repetitiously prefaced with "This may only be for me, but..."? Is that the objection?
This isn't about what does or doesn't offend, or how posts should or shouldn't be prefaced. This is about me saying "hey now, be careful with generalizations that won't necessarily apply to everyone", and apparently you disagree. How the hell can you have a problem with that message? Why do you think me pointing that out is somehow the same as me getting offended by something?
It's weird - as one of the few proponents of newer D&D on this forum, somehow everyone automatically assumes I'm only here to talk down about other systems and talk big about 5e ... I'm not. I hate system talk! I find it dry, tedious, and it usually leads to nothing but stupid arguments that spin off more tangents than a TI-82.
Read through my posts again. Like seriously, open my profile, go to Postings, and actually, really read through them with the approach of understanding why I posted what I've posted in the first place. You'll notice my statements are rarely concrete. I almost always leave some wiggle room, by prefacing with "Personally..." or "I don't believe..." or "In my opinion..." or "I prefer..." - there's always a degree of subjectivity in my posts. Either that, or what I mention is just advice ("That treasure sounds a little dull, maybe try this instead..."), not gospel.
Last edited: